100+ Safety Cases · ISO 26262 · IEC 61508 · ISO 13849 · Automotive & Robotics

Functional safety
starts late, takes
too long, ends in
re‑review —

and requires boring docs.
SaferEngineer Accelerator fixes all four.

Heebeom Park
Book a Free 30-min Call See proven results →

No sales pitch · Focused technical conversation · Response within 48h

100+
Safety Cases Approved
70%
Efficiency Gain
20→5
Safety Goals Consolidated
3yr+
Avg. Client Engagement
The Problem

Why safety teams
never catch a break

01 —

It starts late. Or doesn't start.

SW and design engineers hold the critical inputs. When they're busy with the next release, safety work waits. When documentation is missing or too abstract, safety engineers can't proceed alone — and analysis never begins.

Dependency Bottleneck
02 —

Preparation consumes everything.

Gathering specs, parsing code, extracting BOM from schematics, calculating FIT rates — 80% of the time goes to preparation before any real safety judgment begins.

Resource Drain
03 —

Re-review eats what's left.

Inconsistencies across documents. Missed traceability links. Findings in confirmation review that trace back to square one. The cycle repeats — and each loop costs weeks.

Verification Loop
04 —

Nobody wants the documentation.

FMEDA tables. Assessment reports. Impact analysis matrices. Confirmation review packages. The work is necessary — but it's repetitive, error-prone, and no engineer celebrates doing it.

Documentation Burden
The Accelerator

Five workflows.
Automated first.
Expert-finished.

SaferEngineer Accelerator handles the preparation burden across every major functional safety activity — so your expert spends time on judgment, not data gathering.

SW FMEA
⚙️
Before

SW, System and HW Design engineers unavailable. Specs too abstract.

Safety engineers wait for SW architects to explain behaviour. The specifications lack measurable and verifiable system behaviours. Analysis can't start — or starts on a wrong foundation.

Accelerator

Failure modes proposed from spec, code & AI DB

Reads SW architecture and code. Proposes failure modes, preventive/detective actions, and cascading cause-effect chains. Auto-rates RPN. Verifies Freedom from Interference across ASIL boundaries. Expert reviews and finalises.

FMEDA
🔌
Before

Manual chain: schematic → BOM → FIT → ASIL

Each step — BOM extraction, datasheet search, derating from MATHCAD/PSPICE, FIT calculation per IEC 62380/61709 and SN 29500, FMEDA population, Safety Mechanism placement — done by hand. The failure effects of the HW Component failure modes when it comes to the safety goal violation must also be determined manually for each component.

Accelerator

Full pipeline automated to initialised FMEDA

Extracts BOM from schematic, finds component specs, imports derating values, calculates FIT per standard. Populates FMEDA, describes failure effects per Safety Goal, maps Safety Mechanisms from DB to initialise DC coverage. Expert verifies.

Assessment
📋
Before

Hundreds of work products checked manually

Review criteria define what must be checked. Finding relevant documents across repositories and verifying consistency and correctness — done by hand, one by one.

Accelerator

Auto-mapped, consistency-checked, finding-ready

Takes review criteria as input, pulls relevant documents from repository, checks consistency and correctness automatically, generates structured finding report. Expert makes final judgement and approval.

Confirmation Review
✅
Before

Same bottleneck as Assessment — at release week

Cross-document verification against release criteria. High volume, high repetition, high stakes — always delayed because it hits at the worst possible time.

Accelerator

Automated cross-check with traceable evidence

Criteria-driven, repository-wide consistency check. Findings delivered with evidence references. Expert confirms scope and signs off — in hours, not days.

Impact Analysis
🔄
Before

Change scope unclear. Manual tracing through Safety Case.

Every change triggers the question: what else is affected? Teams over-scope or under-scope — and find out which at audit.

Accelerator

Auto-generated impact scope in your customer's template

Compares change against existing Safety Case. Identifies impacted work products automatically and generates the report in your customer's template format. Expert reviews scope and draws conclusion.

Expert-in-the-Loop

The Accelerator prepares.
The expert completes.

AI handles coverage, extraction, and first-pass analysis. A senior functional safety engineer — with 100+ real Safety Case approvals — reviews every output, applies integrated system thinking, and delivers results that stand up in audit.

ACCELERATOR — 80%
EXPERT — 20%

The 20% that matters most: judgment, cross-system reasoning, and audit defensibility. That's what no AI delivers alone.

Heebeom Park
Heebeom Park
Founder · Senior FuSa Expert

Global ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 experience across automotive and robotics programs in Korea, Germany, and the USA. Every workflow in SaferEngineer Accelerator was built from real project pain — not theory.

100+
Safety Cases
3
Countries
ISO
26262 · 61508 · 13849
AI+
Expert In Loop
View LinkedIn Profile →
Proven Results

Real projects.
Real numbers.

Korean major Tier 1 Supplier for Chassis Products
ISO 26262 HARA
Tier 1 Automotive · Korea · 2023–24
70%Efficiency
gain
20→5Safety Goals
consolidated
ASIL↓Objectively
justified

"Heebeom and his team developed a highly practical semi-automated hazard analysis tool powered by AI. By integrating NLP techniques and vehicle dynamics, the tool enabled us to analyze a wide range of hazardous situations with greater speed and objectivity. His contribution greatly improved the quality and consistency of our hazard analysis process."

Senior Functional Safety Engineer · Korean major Tier 1 Supplier for Chassis Products · 2025
HARAASIL JustificationVehicle DynamicsExcel AutomationSafety Goal Reduction
Major Global ASIL D Tier 1 Supplier
ISO 26262 · ASIL D Product
USA, EU
69%Analysis efficiency
improvement
↓↓Re-verification
review count
3yr+Ongoing
engagement

"Overall analysis efficiency improved by 69.1% — nearly 70%. The number of Re-Verification Reviews was significantly reduced. The overall consistency increased, while the number of engineering work products and findings decreased."

Safety Lead · ASIL D Products · 2025
FMEDAAssessmentConfirmation ReviewSafety CaseMCU Safety Manual
FAQ

We don't avoid objections —
we design our service around them.

We combine automation and expert judgement in two clear steps:

  • Step 1 — AI Draft & Coverage: Our AI engine handles the heavy, repetitive work: scanning documents, checking consistency, and generating a first pass of analyses and safety case content based on your standards and templates.
  • Step 2 — Expert Review & Coaching: A senior functional safety expert reviews, refines, and challenges every AI result, applying integrated system thinking that current models cannot replicate. We then coach your team so they understand the rationale, not just the final document.

The result: AI gives you speed and coverage, while our experts ensure that the final output is realistic, defensible, and audit-ready.

We do not treat AI like a generic chatbot and hope for the best. Our workflow is built to minimize hallucinations and put accuracy first:

  • Full-document review: instead of answering isolated prompts, our system reviews the entire safety case, FMEA, or work products against structured checklists and rules.
  • No "speed over quality" compromise: we deliberately trade a bit of raw speed to gain traceability, evidence referencing, and robust reasoning.
  • Expert as final gate: every critical conclusion is reviewed by an experienced functional safety engineer who can spot unrealistic assumptions, missing links, or weak arguments.

AI boosts coverage and highlights issues humans might overlook, but the final quality is guaranteed by expert verification, confirmation review, and significantly fewer re-review iterations.

We treat your design data as safety-critical and business-critical, not as "just another dataset".

  • On-premise first: where possible, we recommend an on-premise setup so all sensitive data stays inside your network.
  • Secure managed option: if on-premise is not feasible, we host on our servers with strong security measures: encryption in transit and at rest, strict access control, tenant isolation, and audit-ready logging.
  • GDPR-level governance: even outside the EU, we follow policies aligned with GDPR principles for data minimization, retention, and deletion.
  • Legal protection: every engagement is backed by an NDA and contractual restrictions to prevent unauthorized disclosure or reuse of your design data.

In short: we design the technical and legal setup so your data is never exposed to other customers or public models.

No. Our goal is to make your experts more effective, not obsolete.

  • AI handles repeatable, low-leverage work: scanning documents, checking patterns, generating drafts and traceability views.
  • Your engineers stay in control of the safety concept, trade-offs, and final decisions.
  • We reduce the time they spend on re-review, formatting, and manual consistency checks — so they can focus on real engineering.

Think of our service as an "AI co-pilot plus senior reviewer" that lets your team spend their time where human judgement really matters.

Your project.
Faster. More accurate.
Safety Case-ready.

Share a short description of your project, standards in scope, and timeline.
We'll respond with a concrete proposal within 48 hours.

No sales pitch · Focused technical conversation · Response within 48h